The thing that stood out to me the most in Speaking of Courage was
how Norman was stuck in a very materialistic mindset. He bring up the
death of Kiowa, but not in the way that we would expect. He is constantly going
on about if he had pushed through the stench he could have saved Kiowa, but not
because he feels guilty for his death, but because he could have won the Silver
Star. The way he regards his comrade's life, his friend's life, in such a
disrespectful manned was surprising to me.
When I read this chapter I couldn’t help but to be reminded
of a story that I read a while ago. I forget the title but it went something
like this. A man has a mental breakdown, and no matter what his family does
they can’t get him to speak about it. They eventually call in a physiologist to
talk to him. Eventually he begins to speak. The first time he talks he goes on
to talk about how during World War 1 his friend, Mac, died to mustard gas. He
goes on for a few more minutes talking about bravery and his home on the river
before the psychologist leaves. The next day the psychologist returns and asks
the man about Mac. The man responds with a story about how he died of carbon
monoxide working in an iron smelter. The doctor then asks which of his friends
died in the war. The man replies that it was his friend Kevin who died in the
war. Now this story has more in
common with Speaking
of Courage than at first glance.
Those who suffer from PTSD can have hallucinations, things that seem like they
are real but are actually not. In Speaking
of Courage Norman lost both of his friends to similar circumstances.
Add in the consequences of the war and it becomes difficult for Norman to tell
reality from not. To Norman, Kiowa and Max are connected. The similar
circumstances of death may have crated a link in Norman’s brain. When he talks
about saving Kiowa to win the Silver Star, he may be thinking that by saving
Kiowa he saves Max someone who often talked about God as an idea, a goal to
strive towards, a silver star to reach for.
Just like the man in the story did not wish to open
up about what happened, Norman avoids telling his stories. But where the man
eventually opened up, Norman remains hesitant, letting made up discussions
substitute for actual conversation. However what’s not to say that to Norman
these conversations eventually become reality, that he viewed what he created
as being true? What’s not to say that, much like the story of the man, he made
something up? In the end Norman Bowker imagined a different reality, a place
where it was easy for him to begin speaking of courage.
More information on PTSD here
I really liked your connection of Tim's friends and Jesus. I would not have seen this if you had not pointed it out..great job!
ReplyDeleteNice post, James! In your second paragraph, you made some great connections between the story you read and O'Brien's "Speaking of Courage." As you stated, Bowker is experiencing PTSD. I think this accounts for what you view as his materialistic mind-state. Going along with this, I agree that Bowker may care more about his own failure to save Kiowa rather than just the actual death of Kiowa itself.
ReplyDeleteI wish we knew the name of the story you read, it seems very interesting! I agree with you, Norman could have made something up; this is like a few chapters back in "How to Tell a True War Story," we don't really know if war stories are true or not, and neither does the author/narrator of the story. Nevertheless, great job! I really liked your analysis as well.
ReplyDeleteI definitely agree with the point you made that Norman could be making details up. Actually, throughout the story Tim O'Brien tells us that many war stories are exaggerated in an effort to make us feel the same may the soldier felt at the time. Also good connection to the book you read. Great job James!
ReplyDeleteGood job, James! I really liked how you addressed PTSD because I think it is something that is overlooked in that people may think that these soldiers are making a bigger deal out of it than they should, but talking about PTSD showed that this idea is far from true.
ReplyDeleteGood job James! I really agree with your analysis of Bowker's mental state and how you believe he has PTSD. It had a very nice flow to it that ended with a great question of the reader. The uncertainty of whether Normal thinks these events are reality or not is a very interesting idea, and I think O'Brien leaves this up to the reader.
ReplyDeleteI think it is interesting the way that you brought up the hallucinations. I hadn't thought about the fact that Norman may have a distorted view of reality due to what he went through, overall very interesting post.
ReplyDeleteI really like how you related this and stated your topic so clearly!
ReplyDeleteI really like how you related this and stated your topic so clearly!
ReplyDelete